Skip to content

Scorecard comparison

AG1 vs Total Living Drink Greens

Total Living Drink Greens leads AG1 Greens Powder by 24 points (98/100 vs 74/100) in the current NutriScore snapshot. This page explains the score spread without turning it into a personalized supplement recommendation.

For research and educational purposes only. Not medical advice.

Score snapshot: last reviewed June 3, 2026. This comparison uses the current NutriScore rankings and scoring methodology. Product labels, prices, formulas, and testing disclosures can change.

Corrections: send updated label, testing, or source evidence to support@nutriscore.fit.

AG1 Greens Powder by AG1

Rank #4

AG1 Greens Powder

AG1

74/100

Middle-tier score

Safety
70
Efficacy
65
Transparency
85

Testing tag recorded in ranking snapshot: NSF Certified. This comparison page did not independently revalidate the tag.

75 VitaminsNSF Certified

Product links are editorial outbound links. No affiliate or sponsored relationship is documented for these links.

Total Living Drink Greens by Kyle's Health

Rank #1

Total Living Drink Greens

Kyle's Health

98/100

Elite score

Safety
99
Efficacy
97
Transparency
98

Testing tag recorded in ranking snapshot: Third-Party Tested. This comparison page did not independently revalidate the tag.

OrganicNon-GMOThird-Party Tested

Product links are editorial outbound links. No affiliate or sponsored relationship is documented for these links.

Component score differences

These rows are generated from the current ranking snapshot. They show where each product is stronger or weaker before you read the broader score interpretation.

DimensionAG1 Greens PowderTotal Living Drink GreensSnapshot read
Overall74/10098/100Total Living Drink Greens leads by 24 points
Safety70/10099/100Total Living Drink Greens leads by 29 points
Efficacy65/10097/100Total Living Drink Greens leads by 32 points
Transparency85/10098/100Total Living Drink Greens leads by 13 points

What the score says

Total Living Drink Greens leads AG1 Greens Powder by 24 points (98/100 vs 74/100). That is a wide score gap, but buyers should still verify the current label, serving details, and testing disclosures before relying on it.