Label audit

Greens transparency checklist

Check whether a greens powder gives enough label, testing, and price context to compare it without trusting the marketing page.

Boundary: For research and educational purposes only. Not medical advice.

Public disclosure checks

Individual ingredient doses are disclosed.No proprietary blend hides the ingredient order or amounts.A public COA or testing report is available.Heavy-metal results use clear per-serving or convertible units.Relevant third-party certification is named and verifiable.Sweeteners, colors, flavors, gums, and allergens are easy to find.Price, serving count, subscription terms, and shipping are clear.Claims avoid disease, detox, miracle, or replacement language.

Transparency result

Not enough public information

Checklist score

0/100

Treat the product page as marketing until the brand publishes clearer label and testing evidence.

Missing or weak signals

Individual ingredient amounts are hidden or bundled, so dose claims cannot be checked cleanly.
A proprietary blend makes the formula harder to compare against evidence or alternatives.
No public COA or testing report means buyers cannot verify contaminant or identity testing posture.
Contaminant disclosures are missing, vague, or not expressed in buyer-useful units.
Certification claims are missing, vague, or not tied to a verifiable public listing.
Additives, flavors, colors, gums, or allergen context are buried or incomplete.
Real cost is hard to calculate because price, servings, subscription, or shipping terms are unclear.
The page leans on aggressive claims that should require stronger evidence than marketing copy.